Epstein Files Names: Who Appears and What Documents Say

Understanding the Names in the Files

The phrase "Epstein list" has become one of the most searched terms in the case, but it is widely misunderstood. There is no single "list" of co-conspirators or clients. Instead, names appear across thousands of documents in varying contexts — from flight logs and phone records to deposition testimony and victim statements.

Being named in the Epstein files does not imply criminal conduct. Many individuals appear as witnesses, professional contacts, social acquaintances, or people who had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes.

Sources of Names

1. The Giuffre v. Maxwell Documents (2024 Unsealing)

The January 2024 unsealing of documents from the Giuffre v. Maxwell defamation case produced the most widely discussed "Epstein list." According to court records:

• The documents included deposition transcripts, correspondence, and exhibits
• Names appeared as references in testimony, not as a compiled list
• Individuals were mentioned in widely varying contexts — some as accused participants, others as witnesses or casual mentions
• The court explicitly noted that appearing in documents does not indicate wrongdoing

2. The DOJ Epstein Library (January 2026)

The DOJ's release of 3.5 million pages under the Transparency Act vastly expanded the documentary record, according to DOJ records:

• The release included FBI investigation files, interview transcripts, and communications
• The DOJ compiled a "politically exposed persons" list for Congress — individuals with political positions referenced in the files
• Six names were initially over-redacted and later restored after AG Bondi acknowledged the error
• Many names remain redacted under the Act's provisions for victim and witness protection

3. Flight Logs

Unsealed flight logs from Epstein's aircraft documented passengers, according to court records:

• The logs recorded names, dates, and routes
• Not all flights traveled to Epstein's island — many were routine trips between major cities
• Being listed as a passenger does not indicate awareness of criminal activity
• The logs do not document what occurred at destinations

4. Contact Lists and Phone Records

Documents included Epstein's contact information for hundreds of individuals:

• Contact lists included politicians, celebrities, academics, and business figures
• Having contact information for someone does not establish a meaningful relationship
• Phone records showed frequency of contact but not content of conversations

Categories of Named Individuals

Based on court proceedings and verified reporting, named individuals generally fall into these categories:

Convicted or Charged

• Ghislaine Maxwell — Convicted December 2021; 20-year sentence
• Jean-Luc Brunel — Arrested December 2020; died in custody February 2022
• Prince Andrew — Arrested February 2026 on misconduct charges (pending)

Granted Immunity Under 2007 NPA

• Several unnamed co-conspirators received blanket immunity under the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement
• The immunity provisions prevented prosecution regardless of the evidence

Named in Victim Testimony

• Multiple individuals were named by victims in depositions and statements
• Some have been accused in civil proceedings; others have denied allegations
• Civil settlements have been reached in several cases

Professional or Social Contacts

• Hundreds of individuals appear as professional contacts, social acquaintances, or public figures who interacted with Epstein
• Many had no documented awareness of criminal activity
• Contact alone does not establish complicity

The "Politically Exposed Persons" List

In February 2026, AG Bondi confirmed the DOJ compiled a classified list of "politically exposed persons" — individuals with political positions referenced in the files. This list was transmitted to congressional committees but has not been publicly released.

The Redaction Controversy

The DOJ's redactions have been a major point of contention:

• AG Bondi acknowledged six names were "wrongly redacted" and ordered their restoration
• Victims' advocates have argued that redactions protect perpetrators rather than victims
• The DOJ has maintained that redactions are necessary to protect ongoing investigations and witness safety
• Congressional members who accessed unredacted files in secure reading rooms have been constrained in what they can publicly disclose

What We Know and What We Don't

Established facts:

• Names appear across multiple categories of documents in varying contexts
• Being named does not imply criminal liability
• One person has been convicted (Maxwell); one has been arrested (Prince Andrew)
• Several associates received immunity under the 2007 NPA
• The DOJ has compiled a classified PEP list for Congress

What remains unknown:

• The complete contents of the classified PEP list
• Whether additional prosecutions will result from the 2026 file release
• The full scope of individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's criminal activity
• The identities behind remaining redactions

Primary Sources

1. Giuffre v. Maxwell documents — CourtListener
2. DOJ Epstein Library — justice.gov/epstein
3. Associated Press, names reporting — apnews.com
4. New York Times, documents analysis — nytimes.com

---

Learn more about the Epstein List and the files release. Browse the document library or explore the case timeline.